In the developed world, we are lucky enough to be able to purchase exotic fruits like bananas and pineapples off supermarket shelves at an affordable price, but how often do we stop to think about how the fruit got there? The supply chain and the workers themselves? As with any large-scale production, there are a number of issues in the pineapple industry.
Similar to the banana industry, four major groups control the supply of pineapples to developed countries. These are: Dole, Del Monte, Chiquita, and Fyffes. This leaves little room for independent producers in the market.
You can read more detail about the problems below about the social, human health and environmental problems of pineapples below. This video provides a good introduction to how cheap labour and pesticides mean low prices for pineapples in European supermarkets.
Approximately 70% of workers in the Costa Rican pineapple industry are Nicaraguan migrants. These migrant workers are the secret to Costa Rica’s pineapple success. They provide a cheaper and more flexible workforce. Many have no official papers or visas, which leaves them particularly vulnerable to the power of their employers, who can sack and deport them at any sign of trouble, for example, if they complain about working conditions or join a trade union.
Around 50% of workers on Costa Rican pineapple plantations are hired through subcontractors who provide a flexible, low paid and non-unionised workforce. They also allow the producing companies to avoid direct responsibility for ensuring adequate working conditions in line with national and international labour laws.
In Costa Rica, the typical wage for pineapple workers is above the national average at €73 per week. However, they are expected to work at least 80 hours per week to earn this 'privilege'. Many pineapple workers earn around half of what they deem to be a 'living wage'.
Unemployment amongst women in Costa Rica is around 11.2%, and pineapple companies increasingly prefer to employ men due to the 'high costs' associated with employing women, such as maternity pay. For those women that have secured work, the conditions can be very difficult, such as discrimination and, in some cases, sexual harassment. A report by Banana Link looking at the pineapple industry in Costa Rica found that three women working on one PINDECO (a Del Monte subsidiary) plantation alleged severe cases of sexual discrimination and harassment from male plantation managers. Women have also reported being sacked for becoming pregnant. The long working hours are particularly challenging for women who are left with no spare time to care for the family and household.
The level of union organisation is extremely low (about 2%) in the Costa Rican pineapple industry. Union members can face discrimination, persecution and sometimes violence. Anti-union tactics include:
- moving union members to undesirable and low paid jobs
- mass redundancies, with only non-union members being re-hired
- putting union members on ‘blacklists’, preventing them from finding work on other plantations.
Human health and environmental problems and agrochemicals
Use of chemicals
Pineapple production is characterised by large-scale, high-input and monoculture plantations dependent on regular and intense use of a number of toxic agrochemicals. In Costa Rica, pineapples are harvested twice a year, and more than 50 different chemical substances and 30-38kg of chemicals are used per year on one hectare under cultivation. Some of the chemicals like Paraquat are not licensed for use in the EU and are classified by the US as likely to be carcinogenic. According to the law, people working with pesticides are only allowed to work for 6 hours a day, but workers are often engaging in longer hours.
Moreover, the poor environmental practice of both national and international producers is leading to environmental problems of contamination of local aquifers and groundwater, soil erosion, sedimentation and deforestation. Many local communities have also had their natural sources of drinking water contaminated, for example in the communities of El Cairo, La Francia and Luisiana in the Southern Atlantic zone of Costa Rica where over 6,000 people have to rely on government tanks to deliver drinking water supplies to the affected region. Health impacts such as skin diseases, respiratory problems, gastric illnesses and birth defects have also been reported in local communities.
Despite national and international campaigns to halt the damaging expansion of pineapple production and hold companies responsible for their actions, environmental regulations continue to be violated; the pineapple companies’ economic and political power secures their impunity.
Case study: Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) in Costa Rica
Concerns for human health and the environment
- Handling of chlorpyrifos-impregnated covers for bananas (a practice now phased out by certified plantations)
- Dermal exposure to fungicides in fruit packing plants
- Weak compliance with, and inadequate monitoring of, occupational Health & Safety norms.
Smallholder farmers growing export and basic food crops face different exposure risks, related to knapsack and motorised spraying with inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and poor understanding of acute and chronic health hazards. National statistics from 2008 revealed an average of 100 fatal poisonings per year, with methomyl causing the highest frequency, followed by paraquat and terbufos. Over 200 cases of acute poisonings annually were also recorded, raising concerns that commercial agricultural interests were overriding public health and environmental protection goals.
Recent steps in risk reduction
Photo 1: Migrant worker's family, Costa Rica pineapple plantation
Photo 2: Chemical hazard warning sign, Costa Rica pineapple plantation